Poetics and Aristotle
In one of his treatises, The
Poetics, he outlines the Six Elements Of Drama,
based on the Ancient Greek belief that tragedy was the highest form of Drama.
This outline has become a guideline for many playwrights throughout history,
and is especially emphasized in the works of William Shakespeare.
“A tragedy is the imitation of an action that is serious and also, as having
magnitude, complete in itself; in appropriate and pleasurable language;...
in a dramatic rather than narrative form; with incidents arousing pity and
fear,
wherewith to accomplish a catharsis of these emotions.”
Catharsis being a purging of the emotions primarily through art that
brings about spiritual renewal or release from tension or an elimination of a
complex by bringing it to consciousness and affording it expression.
A type of emotional orgasm
Aristotle’s Six Elements of Drama
4 kinds of tragedy:
Complex
Pathetic
Ethical
Simple
Epics: "The Iliad is at once simple and 'pathetic,' and the Odyssey
complex (for recognition scenes run through it), and at the same time 'ethical.'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1jZaIPeD5w&ab_channel=316whatupz
For some history on Space Invaders: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Invaders
He writes: "Like tragedies in Aristotle's time, Space Invaders' story is
obvious and irrelevant. We also know how the story must end--eventually, the
player will be destroyed. The 'fun' of this videogame is not the story, but
rather the gameplay. In the case of Space Invaders and other tragic games, the
player's satisfaction arises not from the literary contemplation of a story,
but the measurement of his gameplay skill as represented by the score."
Matt thinks Space Invaders is tragic, and - as he later points out
- even cathartic. But is it really? And why do we keep playing it if it clears
our souls of eleos (mercy,
pity, compassion) and phobos (fear)?
For more information on
Aristotle: https://plato.stanford.edu/search/searcher.py?query=aristotle
Aristotle invented deductive logic:
Premise: All frogs can swim
Premise: This is a frog
Conclusion: Therefore, it can swim
Similar logical structures or
syllogisms can be produced with: No frogs” and “Some frogs”
He is known for induction: These frogs can swim,
therefore all frogs can swim.
His teleological (circular) approach relies on methodological, cautious
tendencies which rely only on what one knows from what ones’ 5 senses tell them. (This
is in opposition to Platonic tendencies which strive to seek hidden, unrealized
(forms) and ultimate mystical truths through the use of reason.)